Children, a key yet missed demographic in AI regulation (GS Paper 3, Science and Technology)
Why in news?
- India is to host the first-ever global summit on Artificial Intelligence (AI) in October.
- As the Chair of the Global Partnership on Artificial Intelligence (GPAI), India will also be hosting the GPAI global summit in December.
- These events suggest the strategic importance of AI, as it is projected to add $500 billion to India’s economy by 2025, accounting for 10% of the country’s target GDP.
Global framework:
- Against this backdrop, Prime Minister recently called for a global framework on the ethical expansion of AI. Given the sheer volume of data that India can generate, it has an opportunity to set a policy example for the Global South.
- Observers and practitioners will track India’s approach to regulation and how it balances AI’s developmental potential against its concomitant risks.
Regulation for children:
- One area where India can assume leadership is how regulators address children and adolescents who are a critical (yet less understood) demographic in this context.
- The nature of digital services means that many cutting-edge AI deployments are not designed specifically for children but are nevertheless accessed by them.
Threats posed by digital space:
- Regulation will have to align incentives to reduce issues of addiction, mental health, and overall safety. In absence of that, data hungry AI-based digital services can readily deploy opaque algorithms and dark patterns to exploit impressionable young people.
- Among other things this can lead to tech-based distortions of ideal physical appearance(s) which can trigger body image issues. Other malicious threats emerging from AI include misinformation, radicalisation, cyberbullying, sexual grooming, and doxxing.
- The next generation of digital nagriks must also grapple with the indirect effects of their families’ online activities. Enthusiastic ‘sharents’ regularly post photos and videos about their children online to document their journeys through parenthood.
- Beyond this, India is a melting pot of intersectional identities across gender, caste, tribal identity, religion, and linguistic heritage. Internationally, AI is known to transpose real world biases and inequities into the digital world. Such issues of bias and discrimination can impact children and adolescents who belong to marginalised communities.
Governance challenge:
- AI regulation must improve upon India’s approach to children under India’s newly minted data protection law. The data protection framework’s current approach to children is misaligned with India’s digital realities.
- It transfers an inordinate burden on parents to protect their children’s interests and does not facilitate safe platform operations and/or platform design.
- Confusingly, it inverts the well-known dynamic where a significant percentage of parents rely on the assistance of their children to navigate otherwise inaccessible user interface and user experience (UI/UX) interfaces online.
- It also bans tracking of children’s data by default, which can potentially cut them away from the benefits of personalisation.
Blueprint for upcoming Digital India Act (DIA):
- International best practices can assist Indian regulation to identify standards and principles that facilitate safer AI deployments.
- UNICEF’s guidance for policymakers on AI and children identifies nine requirements for child-centred AI which draws on the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (India is a signatory). The guidance aims to create an enabling environment which promotes children’s well-being, inclusion, fairness, non-discrimination, safety, transparency, explainability and accountability.
- Another key feature of successful regulation will be the ability to adapt to the varying developmental stages of children from different age groups.
- California’s Age Appropriate Design Code Act serves as an interesting template. The Californian code pushes for transparency to ensure that digital services configure default privacy settings; assess whether algorithms, data collection, or targeted advertising systems harm children; and use clear, age-appropriate language for user-facing information.
- Indian authorities should encourage research which collects evidence on the benefits and risks of AI for India’s children and adolescents. This should serve as a baseline to work towards an Indian Age Appropriate Design Code for AI.
- Better institutions will help shift regulation away from top-down safety protocols which place undue burdens on parents. Mechanisms of regular dialogue with children will help incorporate their inputs on the benefits and the threats they face when interacting with AI-based digital services.
- An institution similar to Australia’s Online Safety Youth Advisory Council which comprises people between the ages of 13-24 years could be an interesting approach. Such institutions will assist regulation to become more responsive to the threats young people face when interacting with AI systems, while preserving the benefits that they derive from digital services.
Way Forward:
- The fast-evolving nature of AI means that regulation should avoid prescriptions and instead embrace standards, strong institutions, and best practices which imbue openness, trust, and accountability.
- As we move towards a new law to regulate harms on the Internet, and look to establish our thought leadership on global AI regulation, the interests of our young citizens must be front and centre.
